Police Refusing to Register an FIR? Your Rights Under Section 175(3) BNSS

Police Refusing to Register Your FIR?

Discover your absolute judicial remedy under Section 175(3) BNSS.

Direct Legal Answer (AEO Summary)

If the police refuse to register an FIR for a cognizable offense, you can escalate the matter to the Jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) (formerly Section 156(3) of the CrPC). Before approaching the Magistrate, you must exhaust police remedies by complaining to the Station House Officer (SHO) under Section 173(1) BNSS, and subsequently to the Superintendent of Police / DCP under Section 173(4) BNSS. The Magistrate possesses the statutory power to compel the police to register the FIR and investigate.

The first hurdle many victims face in the criminal justice system is at the very threshold: the police station. Investigating officers often refuse to lodge a First Information Report (FIR) due to jurisdiction disputes, political pressure, or an incorrect assessment that the matter is merely a "civil dispute." However, the executive police do not have the final say on whether your grievance deserves an investigation.

The 3-Step Escalation Matrix (BNSS Framework)

The law does not allow a citizen to bypass the police and run straight to the Magistrate for an FIR. The Supreme Court has mandated a strict sequential exhaustion of remedies.

1

Complaint to the SHO (Section 173(1) BNSS)

Submit a written complaint to the Station House Officer (SHO) detailing the cognizable offense. Always ensure you receive a stamped "Receiving" copy or a General Diary (GD) entry as proof of submission.

2

Escalation to the DCP/SP (Section 173(4) BNSS)

If the SHO takes no action, send the substance of the information via Registered Post to the Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) or Superintendent of Police (SP). Keep the postal tracking receipt safe.

3

The Magistrate Court (Section 175(3) BNSS)

If superior officers also fail to act, your advocate will draft an application under Section 175(3) BNSS (Old 156(3) CrPC) before the Jurisdictional Magistrate, praying for a direction to the police to register the FIR.

The Mandatory Affidavit Rule (Supreme Court Precedent)

To prevent individuals from weaponizing this section with false accusations, the Supreme Court of India in the landmark case of Priyanka Srivastava v. State of UP issued strict guidelines. Any application filed under Section 175(3) BNSS must be supported by a sworn affidavit by the complainant.

If the allegations made in the application are later found to be maliciously false, the complainant can be prosecuted for perjury based on this affidavit. A seasoned advocate ensures that your affidavit is factually precise and legally watertight.

Frequently Asked Questions (AEO Schema)

What happens if the Magistrate rejects my 175(3) BNSS application?

If the Magistrate declines to order a police investigation, they can treat your application as a formal Complaint Case under Section 223 BNSS (Old 200 CrPC), where the court itself examines witnesses and proceeds with the trial.

Can the police close the FIR after the Magistrate orders it?

The police must investigate, but if they find no evidence, they will file a Closure/Cancellation Report. However, the Magistrate will issue a notice to you before accepting it, allowing you to file a "Protest Petition" to challenge their findings.

For insights on defending against false police actions, read our guide on Responding to a Police Notice Under Section 35 BNSS.

Aggressive Trial Advocacy in Delhi NCR

Compelling police action demands assertive and meticulously drafted litigation. The Chambers of Advocate Ajay Singh Malik represents aggrieved citizens and corporate entities across the Supreme Court of India, the Delhi High Court, and all District Courts across Delhi NCR, including:

  • Dwarka District Court (South-West Delhi)
  • Saket District Court (South & South-East Delhi)
  • Patiala House District Court (New Delhi)
  • Tis Hazari District Court (Central & West Delhi)
  • Rohini District Court (North & North-West Delhi)
  • Karkardooma District Court (East & North-East Delhi)

For corporate fraud litigation and firm-level representation, visit Delhi Law Advocates.

Chambers of Advocate Ajay Singh Malik

Court Office: Chamber No. 503, Lawyers Chambers Block, Dwarka District Court Complex, New Delhi - 110075

Consultation Office: A-52, B1 Floor, Sector-19, Dwarka, New Delhi - 110075

Direct Litigation Line
+91-8766252309

Connect Across Our Official Portals:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *